Skip to main content
Download PDF

Better caregiver mastery is associated with less anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment

BMC Nursing volume 22, Article number: 307 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

When caregivers have a high level of caregiver mastery, their care recipients with cognitive impairment have less behavioral health problems. However, the relationship between caregiver mastery and anxiety among care recipients over time is unknown. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine that better caregiver mastery is associated with less anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment over time.

Methods

A secondary data analysis was conducted using the Healthy Patterns Clinical Trial (NCT03682185) dataset and guided by Factors Associated with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia conceptual framework. This study included 154 dyads of individuals with cognitive impairment and their caregivers. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed on changes in anxiety. Model 1 included variables at the level of neurodegeneration (i.e., cognitive impairment and age). Model 2 added patient factors (i.e., sleep problems and depression) with the Model 1. Finally, Model 3 included caregiver factor (i.e., caregiver mastery) with the Model 2 to examine how changes in caregiver mastery influence changes in anxiety of care recipients.

Results

Model 3 was statistically significant; after controlling for variables at the level of neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment and patient factors, improvement of caregiver mastery over time (β =-0.230, p = 0.015) was related to decreased anxiety over time (R2 = 0.1099).

Conclusions

Caregivers with high caregiver mastery may have better knowledge on how to care for their loved ones and how to manage their neuropsychiatric symptoms. Therefore, improving the level of caregiver mastery by providing psychoeducational programs and resources that family caregivers need will help reduce the frequency of anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment.

Peer Review reports

Background

The number of individuals with cognitive impairment, including mild cognitive impairment and dementia, is constantly increasing as the baby boomer generation continues to aging [1]. There are 11 million family and unpaid caregivers in the United States [2]; more than one third of all family caregivers who provide care for older adults are providing care for individuals with cognitive impairment [3]. Given the nature of cognitive impairment and loss of ability to complete daily tasks, family caregivers are instrumental in the daily lives of individuals with cognitive impairment, especially for those living at home [2].

Neuropsychiatric symptoms, or behavioral and psychological symptoms are common in individuals with cognitive impairment and can cause a great deal of distress for both caregivers and individuals with cognitive impairment [2]. Anxiety is one common neuropsychiatric symptom present in individuals with cognitive impairment, and it is reported that up to 71% of individuals with cognitive impairment experience anxiety [4]. Anxiety is related to poor quality of life for individuals with cognitive impairment [5, 6] and it also increases family caregivers’ burden [7, 8].

Managing neuropsychiatric symptoms is a key element when caring for individuals with cognitive impairment [2, 9]. While underlying causes for these symptoms are unknown, according to previous literature, patient factors, caregiver factors, and environmental factors can trigger or exacerbate the behavioral and psychological symptoms [10, 11]. In particular, caregiver factors such as caregiver mastery can influence behavioral and psychological symptoms of individuals with cognitive impairment [10].

The definition of caregiver mastery is a positive view of one’s ability and ongoing behavior during the caregiving process [12]. Mastery reflects self-perception of one’s efficacy in caregiving or confidence [12]. Previous studies have reported beneficial influence of caregiver’s positive self-perception in caregiving on care recipients’ health outcomes [13,14,15,16]. For example, high caregiver mastery in their ability to provide care was positively associated with care-recipient’s self-reported health [14]. Furthermore, in another study, poor family mastery was related to greater depression and anxiety among children with epilepsy [16].

Similar relationships exist in those caring for individuals with cognitive impairment [13, 15]. Poor caregiver mastery was related to increased frequency and severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms of individuals with cognitive impairment [15]. Better caregiver mastery was related to a decreased chance of developing anxiety among individuals with cognitive impairment [13]. These results suggest that caregiver mastery may contribute to decreasing neuropsychiatric symptoms such as anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment but are limited by the cross sectional design [13, 15]. The longitudinal relationship between caregiver mastery and anxiety among individuals with cognitive impairment remains unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the relationship between caregiver mastery and care recipients’ anxiety over time. The conceptual model of Factors Associated with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia [10, 11] guided this study. According to this model, neuropsychiatric symptoms of individuals with cognitive impairment can be triggered by neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment, patient-related factors such as unmet needs (e.g., sleep impairments, personal characteristics), and caregiver-related factors (e.g., caregiver mastery) [11]. We adopted the Factors Associated with Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia model to design a conceptual framework for this study (Fig. 1). The three categories, neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment, patient factors, and caregiver factor, were from the original model. For neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment, we included age and cognitive impairment stage based on the original model [10, 11], their relationship to anxiety [17, 18], and availability of variables from the parent study [19]. For patient-related factors, sleep problems and depression were included based on the original model [10, 11], their relationships to anxiety [13, 20,21,22], and availability of variables from the parent study [19]. For caregiver-related factor, we included caregiver mastery as this was our key research question. We hypothesized that improvement in caregiver mastery over time would be related to reduced anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment, after controlling for patient factors.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Conceptual Framework of the Study

Full size image

Methods

Study Design and setting

This was a secondary data analysis using data from Healthy Patterns Clinical Trial, a randomized control trial of a home-based activity intervention designed to improve circadian rhythm disorders and quality of life in community-residing older adults who have cognitive impairment (NCT03682185) [19]. This 1-month program targeted individuals with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers and had an experimental group and an attention control group [19]. In this current study, we used the pretest (T1) and posttest (T2) of the parent study to examine the relationship between changes in caregiver mastery and changes in anxiety among individuals with cognitive impairment.

Participants and data Collection

The parent study enrolled participants who: (1) were over 55 years old, (2) could speak English or Spanish, (3) lived in the greater Philadelphia area, (4) could tolerate wrist actigraphy, (5) were diagnosed with probable dementia based on standard assessments and diagnostic criteria, (6) had caregiver-reported symptoms of sleep-wake disturbances and circadian rhythm disorders, and (7) were taking a stable dose of psychotropic medication for 90 days if prescribed [19]. In the parent study, caregivers were family members or friends who informally cared for the participants with cognitive impairment. The parent study collected the data between February 2017 and February 2020. All participants provided written informed consents for the study. Additional information on the parent study participants and data collection methods can be found elsewhere [19]. For the data collection at the pretest (T1) and posttest (T2), the research staff visited the participants’ home and collected the data using surveys. In this study, a total of 154 dyads who provided information on anxiety frequency and severity (dependent variable) both at T1 and T2 were analyzed. Although this study was a secondary data analysis of an existing data, we conducted a power analysis using G Power 3.1 software to ensure that the sample size is sufficient to answer our research question. With the medium effect size (Cohen’s f2 = 0.15), power of 0.80, probability of 0.05, and five predictors, the required sample size was 92. Therefore, the sample size of this study was sufficient.

Measures

Demographic Information

Demographic information was collected for both individuals with cognitive impairment and their caregivers at T1. For individuals with cognitive impairment, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education were collected. For caregivers of individuals with cognitive impairment, information on age and sex was collected.

Neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment

Neurodegeneration level factors included age and cognitive status of individuals with cognitive impairment.

Patient factors

Cognitive status was measured with the Clinical Dementia Rating (0.5 = very mild dementia; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) [23]. Patient level factors included changes in sleep impairment and changes in depression. Sleep impairment was measured with the PROMIS Sleep Related Impairment Short Form [24, 25]. In this study, the reliability of this 8-item scale was 0.82 for T1 and 0.88 for T2. Caregivers rated symptoms of sleep impairment of the care recipients on a 5-point Likert scale and the total score was standardized [24, 25]. Higher scores indicated more sleep impairment; change in sleep impairment was calculated by subtracting the T1 score from T2 score (T2-T1). Negative values indicated improvement in sleep impairment over time.

Depression was measured with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [26]. This 9-item was on 4-point Likert Scale to ask caregivers to describe their care recipients’ depressive symptoms within the past 2 weeks. Higher scores indicated more depression. The reliability of the scale was 0.85 for both T1 and T2. Change in depression (T2-T1) was included as a covariate in this study, with negative scores indicating improvement in depression over time.

Caregiver factor

Caregiver mastery was considered as a caregiver factor. Caregiver mastery was measured with the Caregiving Mastery Index [12, 27]. The Caregiving Mastery Index is a 6-item scale that asks caregivers to evaluate their ability to care for their care recipients, ranging from never (1) to Always (5). The total possible score ranges from 6 to 30 and higher scores indicate high levels of caregiver mastery. Caregiver mastery was measured twice, at T1 and T2, and the reliability of the scale was acceptable in this study with Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.68 for T1 and 0.66 for T2. The change score between the two time points was calculated by subtracting T1 value from T2 (T2-T1). Positive scores indicated that caregiver mastery improved over time.

Anxiety of Individuals with Cognitive Impairment

The dependent variable of this study was change in anxiety frequency and changes in anxiety severity. Anxiety among individuals with cognitive impairment was measured with one item of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory [28,29,30] by asking caregivers: “Is the patient very nervous, worried, or frightened for no apparent reason? Does he/she seem very tense or fidgety? Is the patient afraid to be apart from you?” The NPI was developed to measure symptom states present in the past few weeks. In our study, participants first provided yes or no to the anxiety question. Then, anxiety frequency and anxiety severity were measured. If anxiety was not present, those were coded as 0 for both anxiety frequency and severity. Responses for anxiety frequency were scored with a 5-point Likert scale: No anxiety (0), rarely-less than once a week (1), sometimes-about once per week (2), often-several times per week but less than everyday (3), and very often-essentially continuously present (4). Anxiety severity was scored with a 4-point Likert scale: No anxiety (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Both anxiety frequency and anxiety severity of individuals with cognitive impairment were measured at T1 and T2. For the purpose of this study, change in anxiety frequency was calculated by subtracting anxiety frequency at T1 from anxiety frequency at T2 (T2-T1). Positive values indicated increase in frequency over time. Similarly, change in anxiety severity was calculated by subtracting anxiety severity at T1 from anxiety severity at T2 (T2-T1), and positive values indicate increase in severity over time.

Data Analysis

Descriptive analyses in this study included means, standard deviations, and percentages. In order to ensure there were no differences based on the group assignment before conducting the main analyses, we used independent t-tests to examine differences in all variables based on group assignment. Next, stepwise multiple regression analyses were performed on changes in anxiety frequency following the conceptual framework of the study. Model 1 included variables at the level of neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment (i.e., cognitive impairment and age). Model 2 added patient factors (i.e., sleep problems and depression) in addition to Model 1. Finally, Model 3 included caregiver factor (i.e., caregiver master) in addition to Model 2 to examine how changes in caregiver mastery influence changes in anxiety of care recipients. We used listwise deletion and only the complete cases were used for the final regression model [31]. Multicollinearity was checked using variance inflation factors. Stata BE 17 [32] was used for all statistical analyses. The level of statistical significance was set at alpha = 0.05. This secondary data analysis used the STROBE checklist for reporting cohort studies. For the regression models, we used listwise deletion methods [31], and 39 dyads (25%) dropped out because of missing data. We compared all variables used in the models between the complete cases and those with missing data. There were no statistical differences between two groups in terms of age, cognitive impairment, changes in sleep, changes in depression, changes in caregiver mastery, changes in anxiety frequency, and changes in anxiety severity. Multicollinearity was not detected with all variance inflation factors (VIF) were less than 2.

Results

Table 1 describes the characteristics of the individuals with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers (N = 154). The mean age of the participants was 73.26 ± 8.41 years. The majority of study participants were Black or African Americans, had very mild dementia, and had high school education or less. The mean age of the family caregivers was 55.8 ± 13.8 years and 83.4% of the caregivers were female.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study participants (N = 154)†
Full size table

For the 1-month period from the pretest and posttest, the mean change of sleep impairment and depression was − 1.32 ± 6.55 (p = 0.020) and − 0.83 ± 2.74 (p = 0.008), respectively, indicating that sleep impairment and depression decreased over time. The mean change of caregiver mastery among family caregivers was 0.41 ± 2.92 (p = 0.118) indicating that caregiver mastery improved over time though it was not statistically significant. The mean change of anxiety frequency was − 0.21 ± 1.00 (p = 0.011) indicating that anxiety frequency decreased over time. The mean change of anxiety severity was − 0.16 ± 0.79 (p = 0.012) indicating that anxiety severity improved over time.

Independent t-tests were conducted to compare the means for all variables between the experimental and control groups (Table 2). There were no statistical differences in all variables including changes in anxiety frequency, anxiety severity, and caregiver mastery score. In other words, in this secondary data analysis, there were no differences based on group assignment. Therefore, we did not include the variable of group assignment in following regression models.

Table 2 Difference of the Variables by the Group (N = 154)
Full size table

Table 3 shows the linear regression analysis models on change in anxiety frequency. Model 1 included the variables at the neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment (R2 = 0.0062, F = 0.46, p = 0.631). Next, Model 2 included patient factors in addition to Model 1 (R2 = 0.0583, F = 1.84, p = 0.125). Finally, Model 3 included caregiver factor in addition to Model 2 (R2 = 0.1099, F = 2.74, p = 0.023). Model 3 was statistically significant and indicated that after controlling for variables at the level of neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment and the level of patient factors, improvement of caregiver mastery over time (β=-0.230, SE = 0.033, t=-2.48, p = 0.015) was related to decreased anxiety frequency over time.

Table 3 Multivariable linear regression models on changes in anxiety frequency (n = 115)
Full size table

Similarly, we conducted the linear regression analyses on changes in anxiety severity based on the conceptual framework of the study (Table 4). However, none of the models were significant (Model 1: R2 = 0.0057, F = 0.42, p = 0.657; Model 2: R2 = 0.070, F = 2.25, p = 0.068; Model 3: R2 = 0.084, F = 2.01, p = 0.083).

Table 4 Multivariable linear regression models on changes in anxiety severity (n = 115)
Full size table

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between caregiver mastery and care recipients’ anxiety over time. Based on the conceptual framework, we tested whether a caregiver factor can influence anxiety of individuals with cognitive impairment, after controlling for neurodegenerative associated with cognitive impairment and patient factors. Improvement in caregiver mastery over time was related to reduced anxiety frequency among individuals with cognitive impairment.

Our study finding is similar to previous studies which examined the relationship between caregiver mastery and neuropsychiatric symptoms of the care recipients with cognitive impairment [13, 15]. Low level of caregivers’ self-efficacy was related to neuropsychiatric symptoms of individuals with cognitive impairment [15]. A higher level of caregiver mastery was also related to lower odds of anxiety presentation in individuals with cognitive impairment [13]. The results of this study strengthen the argument that caregivers’ characteristics can influence care recipients’ health and wellbeing [10]. Although caregiver level factors are modifiable factors associated with anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment, a limited number of research are available which examined the relationship between caregiver level factors and anxiety of the care recipients [33].

In the current study, we found that when the level of caregiver mastery is increased, care recipients less frequently experience anxiety. Because mastery is a self-perception of one’s ability to do something, this can be influenced from many other conditions and change [12]. There is a possibility that caregivers with high caregiver mastery may have better knowledge on how to care for their loved ones and how to manage their neuropsychiatric symptoms. Kales et al. (2015) explained that caregivers’ psychological wellbeing can trigger or exacerbate symptoms of individuals with cognitive impairment because of their essential roles in dementia care [11]. In other words, caregivers’ stress, depression, or low caregiver mastery, can interact with other environmental factors and worsen the symptoms [10, 11]. Caregivers’ high confidence in dementia care might have been related to better psychological wellbeing which positively influenced anxiety of the care recipients [10, 13].

The results of this study are aligned with previous literature which explained caregiver factors such as caregiver mastery could influence the behavioral and psychological symptoms of the care recipients with cognitive impairment [10, 11]. Given that a high level of caregiver mastery can lessen the frequency of anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment, future research will need to focus on improving confidence or mastery of family caregivers of individuals with cognitive impairment.

In this study, the regression model on anxiety frequency was significant while the model on anxiety severity was not significant. This is in line with a previous study which showed that caregiver characteristics can influence presence of anxiety in persons whom they are caring for [13]. Further research is needed on how caregiver mastery is related to anxiety frequency and anxiety severity of the care recipients.

Caregiver mastery is not only important for the wellbeing of the care recipients but also the wellbeing of caregivers themselves. Poor caregiver mastery is associated with greater depressive symptoms among family caregivers of people with chronic illness [34, 35]. High level of caregiver mastery also has protective effect against acute stress among caregivers [36, 37]. Even when caregivers felt high levels of caregiver burden, high levels of mastery reduced the risk of death among caregivers [38]. Because caregiver mastery has positive effects both on caregiver themselves and their care recipients, nurses need to evaluate caregivers’ level of caregiver mastery, and if needed, provide resources that are helpful in dementia care.

Psychoeducational intervention programs which aimed to develop caregivers’ skills have increased in recent years, and these interventions have been shown to be effective in improving caregiver mastery [39,40,41]. In addition, another type of intervention program which provided tailored activities for individuals living with dementia based on their capabilities and interests also reduced frequency of behavioral problems of individuals with dementia and improved caregiver mastery over time [42]. Other types of intervention programs such as providing education and resources to dementia caregivers [43] or training caregivers on how to assess neuropsychiatric symptoms and manage neuropsychiatric symptoms of individuals with cognitive impairment [10, 44] were also effective in improving caregivers’ confidence in care. Many families lack information and resources that they need to take care of persons living with cognitive impairment [45]. Therefore, improving the level of caregiver mastery by providing psychoeducational programs and resources that family caregivers need will help reduce the frequency of anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment.

When nurses conduct assessments for individuals with cognitive impairment, we suggest that they also evaluate caregivers’ mastery and confidence in care, because they can influence anxiety of the care recipients. The wellbeing of caregivers is important for both the caregivers themselves and for the loved ones for whom they provide care. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve caregiver mastery by providing education and resources for caregivers so that anxiety level of the care recipients can be decreased. Implementing evidence-based nursing intervention programs in real-life settings aimed at improving caregiver mastery among dementia caregivers will benefit both caregivers and care recipients.

Strengths of this study include the longitudinal design and the unique composition of the sample. To the best of our knowledge, the parent study is one of the largest samples of Black/African American individuals in the community with cognitive impairment and their identified caregivers. It is important to include diverse population in dementia research because racial disparities are reported in dementia care [46, 47]. This study also filled the gap in the literature on how caregivers could influence anxiety symptoms of individuals with cognitive impairment. In addition, the use of a continuous variable of anxiety frequency in this study is also an advantage because previous studies focused only on the presence of anxiety.

There are a few limitations as well. First, since this is a secondary data analysis, we could not control for other covariates that may have influenced caregiver mastery or anxiety, such as relationship factors between the dyads, hours caregiving per day or anxiety status of the caregiver. Second, we used proxy-reported anxiety given that the sample has cognitive impairment. The caregivers with higher mastery may have been more confident which could have subsequently influenced their rating of caregiver anxiety. Additionally, anxiety, as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory only measures state anxiety only, asking about symptoms in the past few weeks. Because both trait and state anxiety are important, future studies should consider both aspects. Lastly, although the time between the pretest (T1) and posttest (T2) was one month for each dyad, because the parent study collected data for three years, each dyad participated in this study at different timepoint during the three-year period. That said, data collection commenced prior to the start of Covid-19.

Conclusions

This study found that increased level of caregiver mastery was associated with reduced anxiety frequency among individuals with cognitive impairment. The results of this study strengthen the argument that caregivers’ characteristics can influence health and wellbeing of care recipients living with cognitive impairment. Nursing interventions to improve caregiver mastery are needed as they may alleviate anxiety symptoms in individuals with cognitive impairment.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from Dr. Nancy Hodgson on reasonable request.

References

  1. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010–2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology. 2013;80(19):1778–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alzheimer’s A. 2023 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement J Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2023;19(4):1598–695.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Riffin C, Van Ness PH, Wolff JL, Fried T. Family and other unpaid caregivers and older adults with and without dementia and disability. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(8):1821–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Seignourel PJ, Kunik ME, Snow L, Wilson N, Stanley M. Anxiety in dementia: a critical review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(7):1071–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson NT, Powers SM, Krestar M, Yarry SJ, Judge KS. Predictors of self-reported psychosocial outcomes in individuals with dementia. Gerontologist. 2013;53(5):748–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goyal AR, Bergh S, Engedal K, Kirkevold M, Kirkevold O. Trajectories of quality of life and their association with anxiety in people with dementia in nursing homes: a 12-month follow-up study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(9):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Regier NG, Hodgson NA, Gitlin LN. Neuropsychiatric symptom profiles of community-dwelling persons living with dementia: factor structures revisited. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35(9):1009–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang S-S, Lee M-C, Liao Y-C, Wang W-F, Lai T-J. Caregiver burden associated with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in taiwanese elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55(1):55–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Brayne C, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. The Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413–46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kales HC, Kern V, Kim HM, Blazek MC. Moving evidence-informed assessment and management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia into the real world: training family and staff caregivers in the DICE approach. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2020;28(12):1248–55.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kales HC, Gitlin LN, Lyketsos CG. Assessment and management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. BMJ. 2015;350:h369.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lawton MP, Kleban MH, Moss M, Rovine M, Glicksman A. Measuring caregiving appraisal. J Gerontol. 1989;44(3):P61–P71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang Y, Hodgson N. Associations between caregiver mastery and anxiety in persons living with dementia: a study of dyads living in community. Geriatr Nurs. 2021;42(5):993–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelley DE, Lewis MA, Southwell BG. Perceived support from a caregiver’s social ties predicts subsequent care-recipient health. Prev Med Rep. 2017;8:108–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Crellin N, Charlesworth G, Orrell M. Measuring family caregiver efficacy for managing behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia: a psychometric evaluation. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(1):93–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Puka K, Widjaja E, Smith ML. The influence of patient, caregiver, and family factors on symptoms of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with intractable epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2017;67:45–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zuidema SU, de Jonghe JF, Verhey FR, Koopmans RT. Environmental correlates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing home patients with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(1):14–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goyal AR, Bergh S, Engedal K, Kirkevold M, Kirkevold Ø. Anxiety, anxiety symptoms, and their correlates in persons with dementia in norwegian nursing homes: a cause for concern. Dement Geriatric Cogn Disorders. 2017;43(5/6):294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hodgson NA, Gooneratne N, Perez A, Talwar S, Huang L. A timed activity protocol to address sleep-wake disorders in home dwelling persons living with dementia: the healthy patterns clinical trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):451.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kabeshita Y, Adachi H, Matsushita M, Kanemoto H, Sato S, Suzuki Y, Yoshiyama K, Shimomura T, Yoshida T, Shimizu H. Sleep disturbances are key symptoms of very early stage Alzheimer disease with behavioral and psychological symptoms: a Japan multi-center cross‐sectional study (J‐BIRD). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(2):222–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goyal AR, Engedal K, Eriksen S. Clinicians’ experiences of anxiety in patients with dementia. Dementia. 2019;18(1):80–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neville C, Teri L. Anxiety, anxiety symptoms, and associations among older people with dementia in assisted-living facilities. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2011;20(3):195–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morris JC. Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(S1):173–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buysse DJ, Yu L, Moul DE, Germain A, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Shablesky-Cade MA, Pilkonis PA. Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep. 2010;33(6):781–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu L, Buysse DJ, Germain A, Moul DE, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Pilkonis PA. Development of short forms from the PROMIS™ sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment item banks. Behav Sleep Med. 2012;10(1):6–24.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lawton MP, Moss M, Hoffman C, Perkinson M. Two transitions in daughters’ caregiving careers. Gerontologist. 2000;40(4):437–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44(12):2308–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cummings JL. The neuropsychiatric inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology. 1997;48(5 Suppl 6):10S–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, Smith V, MacMillan A, Shelley T, Lopez OL, DeKosky ST. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the neuropsychiatric inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;12(2):233–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Allison PD. Missing Data. Volume 136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. In. College Station. TX: StataCorp LLC; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hwang Y, Massimo L, Hodgson N. Modifiable factors associated with anxiety in persons with dementia: an integrative review. Geriatr Nurs. 2020;41(6):852–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pendergrass A, Hautzinger M, Elliott TR, Schilling O, Becker C, Pfeiffer K. Family caregiver adjustment and stroke survivor impairment: a path analytic model. Rehabil Psychol. 2017;62(2):81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vara-Garcia C, Mausbach BT, Romero-Moreno R, Losada-Baltar A, Jeste DV, Grant I. Longitudinal correlates of depressive symptoms and positive and negative affects in family caregivers of people with dementia. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2022;30(2):148–57.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roepke SK, Mausbach BT, Aschbacher K, Ziegler MG, Dimsdale JE, Mills PJ, von Känel R, Ancoli-Israel S, Patterson TL, Grant I. Personal mastery is associated with reduced sympathetic arousal in stressed Alzheimer caregivers. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2008;16(4):310–7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. van Knippenberg RJ, de Vugt ME, Ponds RW, Verhey FR, Myin-Germeys I. Emotional reactivity to daily life stress in spousal caregivers of people with dementia: an experience sampling study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Savla J, Wang Z, Zhu J, Brossoie N, Roberto KA, Blieszner R. Mastery and longevity in spousal caregivers of persons with dementia. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2020;75(7):1558–62.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Brewster GS, Epps F, Dye CE, Hepburn K, Higgins MK, Parker ML. The effect of the Great Village on psychological outcomes, burden, and mastery in african american caregivers of persons living with dementia. J Appl Gerontol. 2020;39(10):1059–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Judge KS, Yarry SJ, Looman WJ, Bass DM. Improved strain and psychosocial outcomes for caregivers of individuals with dementia: findings from project ANSWERS. Gerontologist. 2013;53(2):280–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hepburn K, Nocera J, Higgins M, Epps F, Brewster GS, Lindauer A, Morhardt D, Shah R, Bonds K, Nash R. Results of a randomized trial testing the efficacy of tele-savvy, an online synchronous/asynchronous psychoeducation program for family caregivers of persons living with dementia. Gerontologist. 2022;62(4):616–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gitlin LN, Winter L, Burke J, Chernett N, Dennis MP, Hauck WW. Tailored activities to manage neuropsychiatric behaviors in persons with dementia and reduce caregiver burden: a randomized pilot study. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2008;16(3):229–39.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sikora Kessler A, Mock G, Hendricks D, Robbins L, Kaur H, Potter JF, Burgio LD. Translating the REACH OUT dementia caregiver intervention into a primary care setting: a pilot study. Aging Ment Health. 2021;25(8):1483–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kales HC, Gitlin LN, Stanislawski B, Myra Kim H, Marx K, Turnwald M, Chiang C, Lyketsos CG. Effect of the WeCareAdvisor™ on family caregiver outcomes in dementia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gitlin LN, Hodgson N. Caregivers as therapeutic agents in dementia care: the context of caregiving and the evidence base for interventions. Family caregiving in the new normal. edn.: Elsevier; 2015: 305–53.

  46. Aranda MP, Kremer IN, Hinton L, Zissimopoulos J, Whitmer RA, Hummel CH, Trejo L, Fabius C. Impact of dementia: Health disparities, population trends, care interventions, and economic costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(7):1774–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Coe NB, Lee C. Racial and ethnic disparities in dementia care: next steps. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2216267–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our study participants for providing valuable information for this study. We also would like to thank the Healthy Patterns Study research staff for their effort in collecting the data.

Funding

This work was supported by the New Faculty Startup Fund from Seoul National University [YH] and the National Institute of Nursing Research at the National Institutes of Health [R01NR015226 to NH and K23NR018487 to MVM].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Nursing and Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea

    Yeji Hwang

  2. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Miranda V. McPhillips, Liming Huang, G. Adriana Perez & Nancy A. Hodgson

Authors
  1. Yeji Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miranda V. McPhillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liming Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Adriana Perez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nancy A. Hodgson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YH, MVM, and NAH designed the study. YH conducted literature review, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. LH managed the data, reviewed the analyses results, and provided statistical advice. GAP and NAH contributed to recruiting the participants, and NAH supervised the study. All authors participated in interpreting the data. MVM, LH, GAP, and NAH revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeji Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The original study was approved by Institutional Review Board of University of Pennsylvania (Protocol Number: 825,000). All participants provided written informed consents for the study, and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, Y., McPhillips, M.V., Huang, L. et al. Better caregiver mastery is associated with less anxiety in individuals with cognitive impairment. BMC Nurs 22, 307 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12912-023-01471-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12912-023-01471-x

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us