Skip to main content
Download PDF

Burnout and quality of life in nursing staff during the COVID-19 pandemic

BMC Nursing volume 22, Article number: 14 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the association between burnout and quality of life among nursing staff at intensive care units during the new coronavirus pandemic and identify the influence of sociodemographic variables.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 109 nursing staff members at intensive care units of a public hospital in Brazil. Data collection involved the administration of a sociodemographic questionnaire as well as the WHOQOL-Bref and Oldenburg Burnout Inventory.

Results

The participants presented a high state of burnout and a low score in the physical domain of the quality-of-life instrument. Men (p = 0.037), income (p = 0.011) and burnout (p < 0.001) independently influenced quality-of-life (p < 0.01). Age, being a nursing technician and working at two hospitals exerted an influence on burnout status (p < 0.05). A negative association was found between quality of life and burnout (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our findings showed that burnout due to occupational circumstances affected negatively the quality of life perceptions of nursing staff working at intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The pandemic of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) caused a substantial impact on the practice of nursing staff who work in intensive care units (ICUs) [1, 2]. During this period, these healthcare providers faced daily situations of exposure to the virus, fear of acquiring the disease, high numbers of deaths due to COVID-19 and long working hours, which exacerbated the level of work-related stress [3]. This unprecedented situation in the lives of healthcare providers required adapting to a new reality.

Over time, this context can contribute to mental and physical exhaustion, triggering burnout syndrome [4], which results from repetitive emotional pressure and is characterized by exhaustion, depersonalization and a diminished sense of personal achievement [5, 6].

Burnout syndrome is a multidimensional concept comprising three interlinked but independent dimensions i.e. emotional exhaustion, when workers demonstrate a lack of energy/enthusiasm for the practice of the service; disengagement, when workers become emotionally insensitive; and low sense of professional achievement, which is intrinsically related to the feeling of dissatisfaction with work [7,8,9,10]. The consequences of this syndrome affect the individual, health establishments and patients [6].

Among nurses and physicians who work in ICUs, the incidence of burnout syndrome is estimated to be 25 to 80%, with the degree of impairment ranging from mild to severe [6]. A recent study investigated burnout syndrome in healthcare providers who work in ICUs in Italy and concluded that 60% presented the syndrome during the period of the study. The authors also found that nurses had significantly higher degrees of anxiety and were more likely to have insomnia compared to other healthcare providers [11].

The word burnout is used to denote a state of energy depletion associated with intense frustration with one’s work situation [10]. After the publication of a study in 1974, this term was used to refer to a chronic condition characterized by stress, the depletion of resources and fatigue [12].

This type of occupational stress not only affects one’s work, but also other areas due to the interconnectedness of the aspects of one’s life [13]. Thus, individuals run the risk of developing burnout syndrome at work and also having negative impacts that compromise overall quality of life [14].

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines quality of life (QoL) as the perceptions individuals have regarding their position in life in the context of the culture and value system in which they live and with respect to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns [15]. However, the assessment of QoL, which is a subjective, abstract construct, is recognized to be a complex task. The WHO definition is profound and regards positive and negative facets of life in a multidimensional concept that addresses relationships between the environment and physio-psychological aspects, level of independence, social relations and personal beliefs [16].

A study recently conducted in India with healthcare workers who provided direct care for patients infected with COVID-19 found that 87% experienced a substantial reduction in QoL [17]. The literature also shows that COVID-19 has contributed to a greater occurrence of anxiety and sleep disorders, which not only exert a negative impact on the QoL of healthcare providers, but can also compromise their problem-solving skills [18].

There are several reliable and validated instruments to assess burnout and QoL such as the WHOQOL-Bref [19], Oldenburg Burnout Inventory [20], Burnout Assessment Tool [21], Maslach Burnout Inventory [22], Copenhagen Burnout Inventory [23] and Pines’ Burnout Measure [24].

The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) was developed to measure work related burnout. The OLBI scale does not only assess occupational factors and it can be applied to any occupational category [20, 25]. This instrument has been translated and validated in Brazil and does not require a license for its use i.e., it is free [20].

The WHOQOL-BREF, an instrument used to assess quality of life, is generic and multidimensional. It measures various aspects such as social integration, physical security, mobility, and body image and it can be applied not only to patients but also healthy individuals [19].

Although QoL and burnout among nursing staff have been widely explored in the literature during the pandemic, the present study conducted at a public hospital in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, is relevant, as the hospital is a regional reference institution for the treatment of COVID-19 cases. Thus, this investigation could contribute to the adoption of more comprehensive strategies for the prevention of burnout faced during pandemics in the hospital setting as well as the reorganization of care.

The following were the guiding questions of this study: How does burnout influence the QoL of nursing staff working in ICUs during the pandemic? Are sociodemographic and occupational variables associated with QoL and burnout in the context of the pandemic?

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the association between burnout and quality of life among nursing staff at intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify the influence of sociodemographic and occupational variables.

Methods

Study design

An exploratory cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was developed in the period between July 2020 and March 2021.

Setting

This study was conducted at adult, neonatal and paediatric intensive care units of a public hospital located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, which is a regional reference institution for cases of COVID-19.

Population

Male and female nursing staff aged 18 or older who worked in ICUs providing care for patients infected by COVID-19 and who provided written consent to participate were included in the study. Those on leave during the data collection period, those who exercised administrative activities and those who reported not being emotionally fit to participate in the interview were excluded from the study.

Calculation of sample size

Considering the prevalence of burnout among nursing staff to be 46%, a 95% confidence level and 10% margin of error, the minimum sample size was determined to be 94 participants. The following formula has been used:

$$n={\left(\frac{z_{\alpha /2}\sqrt{p\left(1-p\right)}}{\varepsilon}\right)}^2,$$

Where:

zα/2 = 95% quantile of the normal distribution (1.96).

p = stress prevalence (46%) [26].

ε = margin of error (10%).

Outcome measures

Three instruments were used for the data collection: a questionnaire addressing sociodemographic characteristics, the WHOQOL-Bref [19] and the version of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory [20], both cross-culturally adapted for use in Brazil.

The WHOQOL-Bref is a self-complete instrument that contains 26 questions. Two questions on general quality of life (items 1 and 2) and the remaining questions are divided into four domains: physical, psychological, personal relations and environment. The WHOQOL-Bref is a 5-point Likert scale in which a higher score means a better quality of life. Each domain total score may range from 4 to 20, with higher scores meaning a higher quality of life [19].

The Cronbach-alpha value for the validated Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-Bref [19] was 0.91. WHOQOL-Bref values <60 indicate lower quality of life [27, 28]. In the present study, the translated and validated Portuguese version of the scale was used.

The OLBI is a Likert scale with 15 items divided into two domains: disengagement from work and exhaustion [20]. The disengagement from work aspect refers to the development of negative and cynical attitudes and behaviour at work. The exhaustion aspect refers to feelings of physical fatigue, need to have a rest, feelings of being overworked and emptiness towards work [25].

For the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory [20] a reliability value higher than 0.7 is considered ideal. The exhaustion dimension showed a reliability of 0.92 and the disengagement from work a reliability value of 0.88. This way, both dimensions showed high reliability [20]. According to Peterson et al., mean scores of ≥2.25 and ≥ 2.1 in the exhaustion and disengagement domains, respectively, are considered high [29].

In the present study, the Cronbach-alpha values for the WHOQOL-Bref and the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory were 0.67 and 0.76, respectively.

Data collection and analysis

Each participant answered print versions of the questionnaires individually. The participants were assured anonymity in their answers and that refusal to participate would not have any negative consequences.

All variables were analyzed descriptively. The Shapiro-Wilk was used to check the normality of the data. Generalized linear regression models were run to determine differences in burnout and QoL scores according to sociodemographic and occupational variables (stepwise model). All analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS program, version 22. The level of significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05).

Ethical aspects

This study received approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Botucatu School of Medicine - UNESP (protocol number: 4.069.300) and was conducted following the guidelines for Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE statement) [30].

Results

One hundred twenty-five nursing staff members met the inclusion criteria, 16 of whom declined to participate in the study, resulting in a sample of 100 and nine participants.

Table 1 displays the sociodemographic and occupational characteristics of the participants. The predominant characteristics were the female sex (92.6%), age between 31 and 40 years (39.5%), having a spouse/partner (67.9%), not having children (61.4%), a complete higher education (52.2%) and the Catholic religion (54.1%). The majority worked as a nursing technician (67.9%) in only one hospital (89.9%) during the day shift (62.3%) with a weakly workload of 40 to 49 hours (64.2%) and had not been placed on leave due to infection or a suspicion of infection by COVID-19 (65.1%).

Table 1 Sociodemographic and occupational characteristics of the participants. Botucatu, SP, Brazil, 2022
Full size table

In Brazil, nursing staff are categorised into three types. These are referred to as nurse, nursing technician, and nursing assistant [31]. A nurse is a highly qualified professional with technical and scientific competence who are responsible for the entire nursing staff. A nurse technician is a professional with technical training. They provide direct care to patients at clinics, hospitals, private households and at urgency and emergency services. A nursing assistant is a professional who does repetitive tasks such as hygiene care and comforting patients. They do not work in intensive care units [32].

Table 2 displays the median and interquartile range (25th to 75th percentile) of the factors on the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory and QoL domains. Regarding burnout, a higher median score was found for exhaustion (3.13) than disengagement (2.43), but both scores indicated a high degree of burnout. The most compromised aspects of QoL were the physical domain (12.6) and social relationships domain (13.5).

Table 2 Distribution of median (25th-75th percentile) of Oldenburg Burnout Inventory factors and WHOQOL-Bref domains. Botucatu, SP, Brazil, 2022
Full size table

Table 3 displays the results of the multivariate analyses using generalized linear models for quality of life and burnout. Age (p = 0.022), burnout (p < 0.001), the male sex (p = 0.037) and monthly family income (p < 0.01) exerted a significant influence on QoL. Number of hours worked (p = 0.011), being a nursing technician (p = 0.041), number of jobs (p = 0.042) and quality of life (p < 0.001) exerted a significant influence on burnout.

Table 3 Generalized linear models and their β coefficients for quality of life and burnout. Botucatu, SP, Brazil, 2022
Full size table

Discussion

The assessment of quality of life and burnout of health professionals have been used to guide interventions and to develop public health policies, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic in several countries [33, 34].

The predominant characteristics of the study sample were being a woman, having a complete higher education, being a nursing technician and not having children. These results are compatible with data described in previous studies conducted in Brazil with nursing staff who work at urgent and critical care units [35, 36]. Most participants earned between R$1.000 to 3.000 (USD 184 to 552) a month, which is lower than that identified in a study conducted in the state of Minas Gerais involving 160 nursing staff, in which 66% of nursing technicians earned R$4000 (USD 736) or more per month [37].

The most affected aspects of QoL were the physical and social relationships domains. These findings may be attributed to the absence of recreational/leisure activities, the impact on financial resources and other factors resulting from the changes imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic [38].

Regarding burnout, the results demonstrated that the nursing staff evaluated had high scores for both the exhaustion and disengagement domains, which, according to the authors of the instrument, constitute burnout syndrome [29]. These results may be attributed to the complexity of patients admitted to ICUs, which can contribute to emotional exhaustion as well as high levels of depersonalization and dissatisfaction with work among the healthcare providers who work in these settings [39].

A study conducted in Iran with 245 participants reported similar findings, identifying greater frequencies of burnout among nurses who have worked on the frontline of the pandemic compared to other nurses [40]. These healthcare providers face several problems, such as anxiety, the fear of infection, excessive work burden, extreme weariness and depression, due to the fact that they work with critically ill patients on a daily basis, which may indirectly contribute to the occurrence of burnout syndrome [41].

A comparative study involving healthcare providers at ICUs before and during the pandemic demonstrated an increase of 23 to 36% in the prevalence of burnout, indicating that the burden of responsibilities and the performance of such services for a prolonged period of time contribute to the development of this syndrome [42].

To date, there are various instruments to assess burnout of health professionals. They aim not only to avoid the adverse consequences of burnout for the personal life of health professionals but also to improve patient care and stimulate the development of preventive strategies at health services [43]. In this context, a new multidimensional instrument called the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) was developed to measure six dimensions that capture exhaustion symptoms related to burnout: exhaustion, mental detachment, cognitive impairment, emotional impairment, psychological stress and psychosomatic complaints [43].

However, a study conducted during the pandemic showed the importance of promoting compassionate relationships at the working environment as a preventive strategy to reduce occupational risks in health services. Based on the protective effect of compassion, the authors believed that their study could contribute to the improvement of research instruments used to assess work related stress, since compassion is poorly assessed [44]. Therefore, assessing compassion could improve both the health of professionals and general wellbeing at work [44].

To answer the second research question of the present study, a multiple linear regression analysis was performed with QoL and explanatory variables. This outcome was positively associated with income and negatively associated with age, the male sex and burnout. The negative impact of burnout on QoL may be attributed to the considerable psychological pressure and excessive work burden to which nursing staff in critical care units were exposed during the pandemic. A study conducted in Turkey with 240 healthcare providers found high levels of stress, anxiety and burnout, which exerted a negative impact on QoL [45].

Another important finding was the positive association between income and QoL, although there is no regulation in the country regarding a minimum wage for the profession. Job dissatisfaction potentially generates physical and psychological problems that tend to exert a negative impact on QoL [46]. This situation was also reported in a study conducted at an adult ICU, in which a low monthly income exerted a negative impact on the QoL of nursing staff [47].

In the present investigation, male nursing staff had a poorer QoL. This finding may be due to the fact that the majority of participants were women and, therefore, may have interfered with the statistical analysis.

The results showed a positive association between the occupation of nursing technician and burnout syndrome. A similar finding was reported in a study conducted at intensive and semi-intensive care units at a hospital in São Paulo, in which 12% of the nursing staff had evidence of burnout and 66.67% of these individuals were nursing technicians, which indicates that the syndrome predominantly affects this job description [48]. However, levels of burnout increased significantly with the emergence of the pandemic due to factors linked to the profession, such as an excessive workload, as well as aspects linked to the pandemic itself, such as the fear of infection by the disease [49]. Although all healthcare providers are susceptible to burnout syndrome, the literature reports that nursing staff were the most affected during the pandemic and also the most affected by symptoms of anxiety, fear and depression [50].

In the present study, burnout was positively associated with the number of working hours and negatively associated with the number of jobs. The increase in the number of hours during the pandemic possibly contributed to this result, with an impact on the emotional exhaustion dimension. In contrast, the negative association with the number of jobs was because only 10% of the participants worked in two jobs, which influenced the comparison of this variable.

The present study has limitations that should be considered. The cross-sectional design restricted the interviews to a single moment in time, which may not have been sufficient to portray the magnitude of the changes imposed by the pandemic. The considerable predominance of women in the sample (92.6%) could also be considered a limitation of this study. Thus, further studies should be developed with a longitudinal design to contribute to improvements in the working conditions of nursing staff.

Contributions of the study

This study highlights the need for healthcare institutions to be prepared for pandemics and possible future outbreaks of COVID-19 with measures of psychological/social support for the protection and follow-up of nursing staff who work on the frontlines of such public health problems. Moreover, better working conditions should be provided so that healthcare providers can obtain adequate rest and replenishment between work shifts.

Conclusion

The results of the present study indicate that the participants had good QoL scores, although the physical domain was the most compromised. Another data presented is that participants who had symptoms of burnout syndrome had a negative impact on quality of life.

In the analysis of sociodemographic variables, male participants and those with burnout syndrome had a worse perception of this construct, while higher income was considered determinant for improving quality of life. The number of hours worked, and the occupation of a nursing technician were associated with an increase in the incidence of burnout.

At present, the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be under control in Brazil, despite the new variants of the virus. However, it is important that the Brazilian government, health services, and policy makers reorganize and improve the health services so that they are better prepared to manage future pandemics, especially for intensive care units and emergency departments. Ideally, strong mental health support should be provided to health professionals that includes psychological treatment. Future research should investigate whether policies have been implemented to reduce burnout levels of professionals in hospitals. Ultimately, health professionals worldwide, who were at the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic, deserve better working conditions and recognition for their sacrifice and hard work.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available to preserve anonymity of the respondents but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Manzano García G, Ayala Calvo JC. The threat of COVID-19 and its influence on nursing staff burnout. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(2):832–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruyneel A, Gallani MC, Tack J, d’Hondt A, Canipel S, Franck S, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on nursing time in intensive care units in Belgium. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021;62:102967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Souza Teixeira CF, Soares CM, Souza EA, Lisboa ES, de Matos Pinto IC, de Andrade LR, et al. A saúde dos profissionais de saúde no enfrentamento da pandemia de Covid-19. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2020;25(9):3465–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruiz-Fernández MD, Ramos-Pichardo JD, Ibáñez-Masero O, Cabrera-Troya J, Carmona-Rega MI, Ortega-Galán ÁM. Compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction and perceived stress in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 health crisis in Spain. J Creat Behav. 2020;29(21–22):4321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mealer M. Burnout syndrome in the intensive care unit. Future Direct Res Ann. 2016;13(7):997–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moss M, Good VS, Gozal D, Kleinpell R, Sessler CN. A Critical Care Societies Collaborative Statement: Burnout Syndrome in Critical Care Health-care Professionals. A Call for Action. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(1):106–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pereira A.M.T.B. Burnout. Quando o Trabalho Ameaça o Bem-estar do Trabalhador. 3o ed. Casa do Psicólogo; 2010. 280.

  8. Carlotto MS, dos Santos Palazzo L. Síndrome de burnout e fatores associados: um estudo epidemiológico com professores. Cad Saúde Pública. 2006;22(5):1017–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de França FM, Ferrari R, Ferrari DC, Alves ED. Burnout and labour aspects in the nursing teams at two medium-sized hospitals. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2012;20(5):961–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job Burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):397–422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stocchetti N, Segre G, Zanier ER, Zanetti M, Campi R, Scarpellini F, et al. Burnout in Intensive Care Unit Workers during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Italian Study. IJERPH. 2021;18(11):6102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Freudenberger HJ. Staff Burn-Out. J Soc Issues. 1974;30(1):159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lasalvia A, Bonetto C, Porru S, Carta A, Tardivo S, Bovo C, et al. Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a highly burdened area of north-East Italy. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021;30:e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pêgo FPLe, Pêgo DR. Burnout syndrome. Rev Bras Med Trab 2016;14(2):171–6.

  15. World Health Organization. Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. WHOQOL : measuring quality of life. In 1997 [citado 23 de novembro de 2022]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63482.

  16. MC de S Minayo, Hartz ZM de A, Buss PM. Qualidade de vida e saúde: um debate necessário. Ciênc saúde coletiva 2000;5(1):7–18.

  17. Suryavanshi N, Kadam A, Dhumal G, Nimkar S, Mave V, Gupta A, et al. Mental health and quality of life among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Brain Behav [Internet]. novembro de 2020 [citado 23 de novembro de 2022];10(11). Disponível em: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/10.1002/brb3.1837.

  18. Korkmaz S, Kazgan A, Çekiç S, Tartar AS, Balcı HN, Atmaca M. The anxiety levels, quality of sleep and life and problem-solving skills in healthcare workers employed in COVID-19 services. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;80:131–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fleck MP, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, Santos L, et al. Aplicação da versão em português do instrumento abreviado de avaliação da qualidade de vida “WHOQOL-bref”. Rev Saúde Pública. 2000;34(2):178–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinval J, Queirós C, Pasian S, Marôco J. Transcultural Adaptation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) for Brazil and Portugal. Front Psychol. 2019;10:338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaufeli WB, Desart S, De Witte H. Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, Validity, and Reliability. IJERPH. 2020;17(24):9495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP, Schaufeli WB, Schwab RL. Maslach Burnout inventory. Consult Psychol Press. 1986;21:3463–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB. The Copenhagen Burnout inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress. 2005;19(3):192–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Malach-Pines A. The Burnout measure, short version. Int J Stress Manag. 2005;12(1):78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Demerouti E, Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Vardakou I, Kantas A. The convergent validity of two Burnout instruments. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2003;19(1):12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. da Silva GAV, da Silva GSA, da Silva RM, Andolhe R, Padilha KG, Costa ALS. Stress and coping among nursing professionals of intensive and semi- intensive care units. Rev enferm UFP. 2017;11(2):922–31.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Silva PAB, Soares SM, Santos JFG, Silva LB. Cut-off point for WHOQOL-bref as a measure of quality of life of older adults. Rev Saúde Pública. 2014;48(3):390–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Silva SM, Santana ANC, Silva NNB da, Novaes MRCG. VES-13 and WHOQOL-bref cutoff points to detect quality of life in older adults in primary health care. Rev saúde pública. 2019;53:26.

  29. Peterson U, Demerouti E, Bergström G, Åsberg M, Nygren Å. Work characteristics and sickness absence in burnout and nonburnout groups: A study of Swedish health care workers. Int J Stress Manag. 2008;15(2):153–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Malta, Monica et al. Iniciativa STROBE: subsídios para a comunicação de estudos observacionais. Revista de Saúde Pública [online]. 2010, v. 44, n. 3 [Acessado 24 Novembro 2022], pp. 559-565. Disponível em: <https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1590/S0034-89102010000300021>. Epub 11 Jun 2010. ISSN 1518-8787. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1590/S0034-89102010000300021.

  31. Lei no 7.498/86. Dispõe sobre a regulamentação do exercício da enfermagem, e dá outras providências. Lei no 7.498/86. jun 26, 1986.

  32. RESOLUÇÃO COFEN 543/2017. Lei no 5.905 fev 15, 2012.

  33. Kandula UR, Wake AD. Assessment of quality of life among health professionals during COVID-19: review. JMDH. 2021;14:3571–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Paula JJ, Souza Costa D, de Oliveira Serpa AL, Silva AG, Pinheiro MIC, Malloy-Diniz LF, et al. Quality of life of health care professionals in pandemic times. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2021;18(3):113–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Teixeira GS, Silveira RC da P, Mininel VA, Moraes JT, Ribeiro IK da S. Quality of life at work and occupational stress of nursing in an emergency care unit. Texto contexto – enferm. 2019;28:e20180298.

  36. Soares AHR, Martins AJ, Lopes M da CB, Britto JAA de, Oliveira CQ de, Moreira MCN. Qualidade de vida de crianças e adolescentes: uma revisão bibliográfica. Ciênc saúde coletiva. 2011;16(7):3197–206.

  37. Nogueira da Silva PL, Leite Pereira I, Fonseca Coelho Galvão AP, Lopes de Figueiredo M, Carolina dos Reis Alves C dos RA, Gomes e Martins A. Fatores intervenientes na qualidade de vida de trabalhadores de enfermagem em jornada noturna. Nursing. 2021;24(272):5172–97.

  38. Pires BMFB, Bosco PS, Nunes AS, Menezes RDA, Lemos PFS, Ferrão CTGB, et al. QUALIDADE DE VIDA DOS PROFISSIONAIS DE SAÚDE PÓS-COVID-19: UM ESTUDO TRANSVERSAL. Cogit Enferm [Internet]. 5 de julho de 2021 [citado 23 de novembro de 2022];26. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/78275.

  39. Alvares MEM, Thomaz EBAF, Lamy ZC, Nina RV de AH, Pereira MUL, Garcia JBS. Burnout syndrome among healthcare professionals in intensive care units: a cross-sectional population-based study. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva [Internet] 2020 [citado 23 de novembro de 2022];32(2). Disponível em: http://rbti.org.br/artigo/detalhes/0103507X-32-2-11

  40. Iran I. Burnout and its influencing factors between frontline nurses and nurses from other wards during the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease -COVID-19- in Iran. invest educ enferm [Internet]. 10 de julho de 2020 [citado 23 de novembro de 2022];38(2). Disponível em: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/iee/article/view/342790.

  41. Shen X, Zou X, Zhong X, Yan J, Li L. Psychological stress of ICU nurses in the time of COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):200 s13054-020-02926–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kok N, van Gurp J, Teerenstra S, van der Hoeven H, Fuchs M, Hoedemaekers C, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 immediately increases Burnout symptoms in ICU professionals: A longitudinal cohort study*. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(3):419–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Borrelli I, Santoro PE, Fiorilli C, Angelini G, Buonomo I, Benevene P, et al. A new tool to evaluate burnout: the Italian version of the BAT for Italian healthcare workers. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Buonomo I, Santoro PE, Benevene P, Borrelli I, Angelini G, Fiorilli C, et al. Buffering the Effects of Burnout on Healthcare Professionals’ Health—The Mediating Role of Compassionate Relationships at Work in the COVID Era. IJERPH. 2022;19(15):8966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Çelmeçe N, Menekay M. The Effect of Stress, Anxiety and Burnout Levels of Healthcare Professionals Caring for COVID-19 Patients on Their Quality of Life. Front Psychol. 2020;11:597624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vieira GC, Ribeiro KV, Velasco AR, Pereira ÉAA, Cortez EA, Passos JP. Satisfação laboral e a repercussão na qualidade de vida do profissional de enfermagem. ABCS Health Sci [Internet]. 20 de dezembro de 2018 [citado 23 de novembro de 2022];43(3). Disponível em: https://www.portalnepas.org.br/abcshs/article/view/1123.

  47. Moraes BFM, de Martino MMF, Sonati JG. Perception of the quality of life of intensive care nursing professionals. Reme Revista Mineira de Enfermagem. 2018;22:e-1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. da Silva GSA, da Silva GAV, da Sil. Stress and burnout in nursing workers of an intensive and semi-intensive healthcare unit. Revisa. 2018;7(1):5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Paiano M, Jaques AE, Nacamura PAB, Salci MA, Radovanovic CAT, Carreira L. Mental health of healthcare professionals in China during the new coronavirus pandemic: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(suppl 2):e20200338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mancio Ferreira da Luz E, Lopes Munhoz O, Morais BX, Bitencourt Toscani Greco P, Camponogara S, Magnago TSB de S. Repercussões da Covid-19 na saúde mental dos trabalhadores de enfermagem. R Enferm Cent O Min [Internet]. 1o de outubro de 2020 [citado 23 de novembro de 2022];10. Disponível em: http://seer.ufsj.edu.br/index.php/recom/article/view/3824.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the subjects who participated in the study.

Funding

This work was supported by Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (grant number ES/T008822/11) and Foundation of Support for Research of the State of São (Process number 2019/09904-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, Paulista State University, São Paulo, Brazil

    Silmara Meneguin, Isabelle Ignácio, Camila Fernandes Pollo & Mayara Salles Gasparini Patini

  2. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Heitor Marques Honório

  3. Department of Epidemiology & Public health, University College London, London, UK

    Cesar de Oliveira

Authors
  1. Silmara Meneguin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabelle Ignácio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Camila Fernandes Pollo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heitor Marques Honório
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mayara Salles Gasparini Patini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cesar de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study design and the data collection tool: SM and II; Data analysis: HMH: Drafting and revising of the manuscript: SM, CFP, II and MSGP; Approval of the final version: CO. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silmara Meneguin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All individuals have provided informed consent before the data collection. Participating students were promised that the information provided would remain anonymous. Approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics committee of the Botucatu School of Medicine, UNESP (protocol number 2,772,325), and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meneguin, S., Ignácio, I., Pollo, C.F. et al. Burnout and quality of life in nursing staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Nurs 22, 14 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12912-022-01168-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12912-022-01168-7

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us