Phase | Action | |
---|---|---|
1 | Familiarizing yourself with the data | • Each included study was re-read following the quality appraisal process • Each study’s key findings were abstracted verbatim and displayed in a display tables (Tables 2–3) |
2 | Generating initial codes | • Initial codes were generated and applied to each finding in the display table • Each unique code was placed in a code table (table not shown) |
3 | Searching for themes | • In an iterative manner, similarities of concepts were explored among the various codes assigned • Codes were gradually grouped together within preliminary themes |
4 | Reviewing themes | • Preliminary themes were then compared and contrasted to examine similarities and differences • Re-coding was performed as necessary • Themes were discussed by researchers to reach consensus |
5 | Defining and naming themes | • Themes were named and a detailed description of each theme was drafted (scope, breadth, depth), including the use of study examples |
6 | Producing the report | • Findings written up with supporting evidence of themes within the data |