Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: How to choose a preceptor: aspects to consider based on a grounded theory study

Original Submission
11 Aug 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Indu Sudarsan
14 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suhyun Kim
29 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Guida Amaral
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Indu Sudarsan
6 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Guida Amaral
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Guida Amaral
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Guida Amaral
Resubmission - Version 6
12 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Indu Sudarsan
17 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Guida Amaral
Resubmission - Version 7
17 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
26 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Guida Amaral
Resubmission - Version 8
26 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
9 Mar 2023 Editorially accepted
31 Mar 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12912-023-01240-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page