Skip to main content

Table 2 Means for students’ ratings on five aspects of midwifery care philosopy

From: Students’ understanding of “Women-Centred Care Philosophy” in midwifery care through Continuity of Care (CoC) learning model: a quasi-experimental study

Aspects

(n = 54) Experiment group (CoC)

(n = 52) Control group (Fragmented)

t

Significant between subterm

Significant between groups

Pre-clinical

     

Personalized care

1.39 (.712)

1.42 (.723)

-0.245

0,087

 

Holistic care

2.59 (1.055)

2.65 (1.136)

-0.288

0,774

 

Partnership care

1.04 (.672)

1.04 (.685)

-0.011

0,650

P>0.05

Collaborative care

2.17 (.746)

2.23 (.703)

-0.455

0,991

 

Evidence-based care

1.17 (.607)

1.15 (.607)

0.109

0,914

 

Total

8.35 (1.824)

8.50 (1.698)

-.432

0,666

 

Post-clinical

     

Personalized care

2.63 (.487)

1.67 (.648)

8.606

0,000

 

Holistic care

4.46 (.539)

3.37 (.886)

7.734

0,000

 

Partnership care

2.65 (.482)

1.38 (.491)

13.365

0,000

P<0.01

Collaborative care

3.57 (.499)

2.77 (.614)

7.418

0,000

 

Evidence-based care

2.65 (.482)

1.46 (.576)

11.519

0,000

 

Total

15.96 (1.063)

10.65 (1.170)

24.469

0,000

 

Significant between subterm within the same group

     

Personalized care

0,000

0,000

   

Holistic care

0,000

0,000

   

Partnership care

0,000

0,000

   

Collaborative care

0,000

0,000

   

Evidence-based care

0,000

0,000

   

Significant pre and post intervention

P < 0.01

P < 0.01

   
  1. Independent t-test (df = 104 ; CI 95%) t table = 1.65964.